Pages

Showing posts with label peace. Show all posts
Showing posts with label peace. Show all posts

If we want Policy instead of Speeches

Vers La Verité Speech in Paris by Cynthia McKinney

President Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize was not the only news yesterday. And in my opinion, it’s not even the biggest news. It’s not even the saddest news. But it does provide us with some critical information as we move forward. The three-part question for us, tonight however, is “What are we moving forward TO; is that the place we want to go; and if not, what do we do about it?

In other words, “What is our vision for the future and how do we define success?”

I have been and am still in deep pain over the institutional homicide of my aunt and in my grief, I’ve considered giving up.

But then, I wiped the tears from my eyes long enough to remember communities of people that I’ve been blessed enough to get to know, from Toronto, Canada to Cape Town, South Africa; from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia to Valdosta, Georgia, there are people struggling through their own pain, their own deep personal disappointments to reach a better place—not just for themselves, but for the global community of man. And I know deep in my own heart, as broken as it is, that I cannot give up. My brain tells me that the struggle for truth, justice, peace, and dignity is too important to lose because of heartbreak.

The one thing that probably best defines everyone in this room are our search for and activities on behalf of principles that are bigger than ourselves. We want our governments to tell us the truth; we want them to deliver justice; we want our global community to live in peace; and we want respect for the dignity of all humankind.

So if these are the ingredients of our vision, what tools do we need to produce the desired result?

Well, first of all, the desired result has to have definition.

I mentioned in one of my messages to a dear friend in response to the Nobel award to President Barack Obama that we needed to keep our eyes on the prize and then I erased it because I don’t think we’ve sufficiently defined what the prize is.

So there must be a small, cohesive, international group of rock-solid people feverishly working to redefine for all who want to be active, and a part of our vision, just what the prize is. And this “prize,” our vision, must be repeated and explained often so people can differentiate our vision, from their reality.

Here is where language becomes important. If we want policy instead of speeches, then this must be repeated early and often because what I’m alarmed by is that in the absence of us providing real definition, and there are reasons for that, people are beginning to think that a speech IS policy.

But, as I said earlier, there was a lot of news yesterday. Some of it even more important than the Nobel Peace Prize Award, but the award certainly overshadowed all other stories.

And I’m always searching for context. Because, as the U.S. military puts it, “perception management” is important. And we must understand the context of what happens and when it happens, in order to understand why.

I always say that we must see the invisible, hear the unspoken, and read the unwritten. That’s what some of the organizers of Vers La Verité were professionally trained to do, before they became whistleblowers, and now our leaders.

Now, what were some of those other interesting news items?

Well, at a Native American Lodge located next to Senator John McCain’s ranch, two people died and several others were hospitalized following a hazardous materials situation at the Sweat Lodge, which is like a spiritual retreat led by Native Americans. I’ve even been invited to participate in one upon my return to the U.S.

Now, I find this interesting and a story that should be followed up on and I will be doing that because I want to make sure there’s no bigger story hidden in an important cultural ritual of the Native Americans who are victims of a genocide in North America that continues to this day.

On the day that the Nobel Prize was announced, we also learned that the U.S. bunker buster bomb will be ready in a few more months.

This is the bomb that holds over 5,000 pounds of explosives and is designed to penetrate hardened facilities, including those underground. Some brilliant people in the U.S. even want to put nuclear tips on bunker buster bombs. However, in announcing the near deployment of the project that pays McDonnell Douglas to adapt the B-2 bomber so it can deliver the Boeing-made bomb to its intended target, the Pentagon press secretary said, "The reality is that the world we live in is one in which there are people who seek to build weapons of mass destruction and they seek to do so in a clandestine fashion." The article noted that the Obama Administration had not ruled out military action against Iran.

Another story noted that hours after winning the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize, President Obama met with his military advisors about troop levels in Afghanistan. The troop increase requested by the U.S. Commander ranged, it is reported, from 10,000 to 60,000—although the top number isn’t listed in that news report. One has to go to another news item to see the true top number. At any rate, it seems that the choices confronting U.S. and European leaders is whether to increase the current 68,000 U.S. boots on the ground in Afghanistan or to merely increase the number of drone attacks. Decreasing death and destruction and bringing our young men and women home is not on the Nobel Peace Prize winner’s agenda for discussion.

The last article of note is about a restaurant in west Georgia that is using the “N-word” on its marquee to describe President Obama. It reminds me of the Atlanta area restaurant that put on its marquee that I was Buckwheat with Boobs. Now, those of you who are from the U.S. will know what that means and the depth of insult that was intended. The article notes that I’ve made this restaurant’s marquee, too. Both restaurant owners claim to not be racists and to be protected by free speech.

My point in including this particular news item is that we still have so far to go just in terms of our human relations. It is imperative that we do what we can to spread our message and our vision and reach those who can be reached.

Which brings me to who can be reached.

Those with enough discernment to know that what is being pronounced from on high is not their reality. And rather than accept or discount the contradictions, we want them to join us and struggle for a better reality for everybody.

I am saddened beyond belief that on the day of the Peace Prize award, a struggling democracy in Honduras was besieged with U.S. supplied weapons and U.S.-trained paramilitaries and snipers in support of coup leaders over the democratically-elected people’s leaders. In fact, the latest dispatch from Honduras is that many of the snipers and paramilitaries—now descending on Honduras from all over Latin America—were trained in my home state of Georgia.

More and more people are experiencing cognitive dissonance and rightly so. Our leaders and respected organizations are lying to us! One friend and former Congressional Staffer of mine puts it this way: we need a democratic military instead of a militarized democracy.

The United States, with the help of its European and Asian allies maintains over 700 bases around the world. The number is increasing under President Obama.

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. said that we must combat racism, poverty, and militarism. Our movement cannot struggle against militarism and fail to address racism. We must be comprehensive and to racism, militarism, and poverty, we must now add gaining control of a media that will allow us to communicate to a broader community and not just within our small spheres, and regaining control of education so that people are not so dumbed down that they actually believe that war is peace, slavery is freedom, ignorance is strength, and lies are truth.

And if we are right, then others will join us. They will share with us their dreams and their passions and we will help to empower them.

Global resistance combined with local action, organization, vision, commitment, and resources will allow us to have significant victories in the future.

Vers La Verité understands that the foundation of all of this action, attainment of the prize, can only happen with truth as our foundation.

It’s already a brave new world, let’s get busy and make it ours!!!

Bookmark and Share

War and peace prizes

The dismaying gift of the Nobel prize puts Barack Obama on the list of its winners who promised peace but prosecuted war
By Howard Zinn, guardian.co.uk, Oct. 10, 2009

I was dismayed when I heard Barack Obama was given the Nobel peace prize. A shock, really, to think that a president carrying on two wars would be given a peace prize. Until I recalled that Woodrow Wilson, Theodore Roosevelt, and Henry Kissinger had all received Nobel peace prizes. The Nobel committee is famous for its superficial estimates, won over by rhetoric and by empty gestures, and ignoring blatant violations of world peace.

Yes, Wilson gets credit for the League of Nations – that ineffectual body which did nothing to prevent war. But he had bombarded the Mexican coast, sent troops to occupy Haiti and the Dominican Republic and brought the US into the slaughterhouse of Europe in the first World War, surely among stupid and deadly wars at the top of the list.

Sure, Theodore Roosevelt brokered a peace between Japan and Russia. But he was a lover of war, who participated in the US conquest of Cuba, pretending to liberate it from Spain while fastening US chains on that tiny island. And as president he presided over the bloody war to subjugate the Filipinos, even congratulating a US general who had just massacred 600 helpless villagers in the Phillipines. The Committee did not give the Nobel prize to Mark Twain, who denounced Roosevelt and criticised the war, nor to William James, leader of the anti-imperialist league.

Oh yes, the committee saw fit to give a peace prize to Henry Kissinger, because he signed the final peace agreement ending the war in Vietnam, of which he had been one of the architects. Kissinger, who obsequiously went along with Nixon's expansion of the war, with the bombing of peasant villages in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia. Kissinger, who matches the definition of a war criminal very accurately, is given a peace prize!

People should be given a peace prize not on the basis of promises they have made – as with Obama, an eloquent maker of promises – but on the basis of actual accomplishments towards ending war, and Obama has continued deadly, inhuman military action in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan.

The Nobel peace committee should retire, and turn over its huge funds to some international peace organization which is not awed by stardom and rhetoric, and which has some understanding of history.

Bookmark and Share

Call for Anti-War Movement to Support May Day 2007

Call for Anti-War Movement to Support May Day 2007

Dear sisters and brothers,

The struggle for immigrant workers' rights needs your active participation and solidarity. Remember May 1, 2006? Millions of immigrant workers from coast to coast walked off their jobs and rallied in just about every major city to demand full rights for undocumented workers.
The same thing is planned for May 1, or "May Day" 2007. Many of you who are reading this appeal probably have a good idea of why it's important for you as anti-war activists to be involved in the movement for immigrant workers' rights. Even so it's worth reviewing just a little.

To begin with, while we march against the war in Iraq, it's absolutely critical that we march against the war on the people right here at home. The level of institutional racism on the part of the capitalist system and government that resulted in massive death and continued suffering in New Orleans is part of a "war at home." So are the police murders of 23-year -old Sean Bell in New York City and 92-year-old Kathryn Johnston in Atlanta several months ago.

When it comes to the government anti-immigrant raids that go on daily, calling it a war is no metaphor. No other word could describe it more accurately. Thousands of immigrant workers have been arrested over the past year alone. On the morning of March 6, an army of hundreds of heavily armed Immigration and Customs Enforcement and FBI agents raided a leather factory in New Bedford, Mass., arresting and terrorizing 350 workers, many of them women whose children were suddenly left stranded. It's time that we UNITE and show by our actions that we are as angry about these raids as we are about the war in Iraq. When we do that, we are truly connecting the struggles against the war abroad and the war at home.

The main weapon that the government and the capitalist media are using to try to deter more people of all nationalities and races from demanding an end to these raids is anti-immigrant racism. When immigrants rally for their rights, and you look out at many of the big immigrant rights rallies and see a tremendous sea of people - including, however, very few people who are either white, or whom you usually might see at a big anti-war march - that's a sign that the divide and conquer with racism strategy is being used.

On May Day 2007, it is up to us to make sure that the anti-war movement shows up to stand side by side, shoulder to shoulder, with immigrant workers against these terrorist raids.

Another point is that it's so important that immigrant workers have chosen May Day as the day to boycott work and rally for their rights across the country. May Day is the day the workers in every part of the world rally and march to show their solidarity with the struggle of all workers everywhere. Even though May Day was born in the working class struggles of the 19th century right here in the U.S., up until recently May Day has not been widely observed in this country. But all of that's changing, in large part because immigrant workers are bringing May Day back to the U.S., along with its message of worldwide working-class unity and militancy and anti-racist, anti-imperialist and anti-war solidarity.

The anti-war movement must get behind May Day 2007 and build for it with the same passion and energy that we put into anti-war marches. If we do that, we will not only be solidarizing ourselves with immigrant workers, we will be helping to revive worldwide working-class solidarity in the country where it is most needed.

Anti-war movement- all out for May Day '07!

Signed by,

LeiLani Dowell, Fight Imperialism-Stand Together (FIST)
Teresa Gutierrez, May 1 Coalition, New York City
Larry Holmes, Troops Out Now Coalition (TONC)
John Parker, March 25 Coalition, Los Angeles

Join us this May Day to STAND UP for Immigrants & ALL Workers Rights!

National May 1st Movement for Workers & Immigrants Rights


Charlotte May 1st Movement for Workers & Immigrants Rights
www.may1charlotte.info
may1charlotte@gmail.com
704.492.8527

Also see:

National Immigrant Solidarity Network

Report on Charlotte Impeachment Day Rally

Charlotte, NC
The People Say Impeach Bush & Cheney NOW

by David Dixon

Some 25 people gathered at a busy intersection near Rep. Sue Myrick's office in the upscale Southpark area of Charlotte calling for the impeachment of President Bush & Vice President Cheney.

There was an overwhelming amount of support from passersby honking in response to a "Honk to Impeach Bush & Cheney" sign. It was incredible with the whole area being filled with honking horns and cheers of support at times throughout the rally. Almost every single person showed suppor by smiling, waving and flashing peace signs & raised fists. Even little kids were flashing peace signs at us.

We had the huge, bright pink CODEPINK "Impeach to Support Our Troops" banner covering a corner of the intersection. In addition to "Impeach Bush & Cheney Signs", others said "Impeach for Peace", one read "Impeach or Get 1776 Again" (referring to the founding revolution) and many more.

The demonstration was part of the April 28 National Impeachment Day actions (see http://www.a28.org/). It was called for in Charlotte by Action Center For Justice with participation from CODEPINK Charlotte, Charlotte Coalition For Peace & Justice, & the Islamic Political Party of America.

The event was ignored by the press, except for the local Fox affiliate, even though they were notified twice about the event.

Impeachment actions will continue in Charlotte with an upcoming Impeachment Teach-In featuring a leader of the national impeachment movement & a Mass Regional Rally featuring Gold Star Families For Peace, Iraq Vetarans Against The War, Veterans For Peace, World Can't Wait, Troops Out Now Coalition, national & regional Impeachment Movement leaders, & many others that will kick off the Charlotte Impeachment Summer Campaign.

For more information & to get involved contact Action Center For Justice at 704.492.8527 or see http://www.charlotteaction.org/.




Oct 18, 2006 Rally Against Bush in Greensboro
(photo CODEPINK Charlotte)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

May 19 National Truth About Recruiters Day
http://www.may19.info/

April 28 Forum on Ending Israeli Occupation

Forum with Ashley Wilkinson on Ending Israeli Occupation

When: Saturday, April 28th at 6:00 p.m.


Where: The
South Musalla located at 559 N. Polk Street, Pineville, NC.

Directions: You can take 77-South to 485 East (exit 2 towards Pineville); after 3.5 miles on 485, take exit 65B towards Pineville merging onto
Pineville Road; Pineville Road becomes N. Polk Road. Go maybe .5 miles, then turn right into a shopping centre like parking lot/road. I believe there's an Arby's on the corner on the right. The south musalla is all the way in the back on the left. Visit www.mapquest.com or yahoomaps if you have any questions.

Ashley recently returned from Bethlehem, Palestine. She spent the past 16 months in the occupied territories, working with the Wi'am Palestinian Conflict Resolution Center. A graduate of Birmingham-Southern College (BS in Psychology 1999) and Duke Divinity School (MDiv 2005), Ms. Wilkinson helped lead Trauma Coping programs with children, youth and women during her time in Bethlehem. She also led Spiritual Reflections and assisted in Non-Violence and Human Rights & Democracy trainings.

To read some of her journals from her time in Bethlehem, visit
http://www2.blogger.com/www.ashleyinbethlehem.blogspot.com

This year marks the 40th anniversary of the illegal Israeli military occupation of the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem.

In order to commemorate this anniversary, the US Campaign along with United for Peace and Justice are gathering people from all across the United States to come together in our nation's
capital and give a clear message to our government: The World Says NO to Israeli Occupation!
This historic event coincides with the call from Palestinian Civil Society for people all over the world to unite on this day to reject the oppression and violence that come from occupation.

The afternoon rally on June 10 will take place on the Capitol Lawn and will feature inspiring and challenging speakers, as well as colorful performances. The group will march from there to the White House, and conclude the day with an evening Cultural Event and Comedy Night for Peace and Justice in the Middle East. On Monday morning, June 11, the group will gather once again for a grassroots lobbying training workshop and then send participants to our Congressional Representatives and Senators.

In our efforts to make these two days a great success, U.S. Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation is traveling all over the States in order to help people mobilize for this event. Ashley will be in the Triangle and Charlotte areas from April 25-29 to share resources from the US Campaign, make presentations about her time in Bethlehem, and help people mobilize for this amazing event that will take place in Washington, DC on June 10-11, 2007.

The U.S. Campaign to End The Israeli Occupation and United For Peace & Justice (Action Center For Justice is a member of both groups) have called for this protest, teach-in and lobby day in Washington, DC. ACJ is organizing for these important events. We are trying to raise money to send a bus load of students & activists. Donate at http://www.geocities.com/nomorevictims/support

To get involved, see www.geocities.com/nomorevictims or call 704.492.8527.

Scott Ritter on Preventing U.S. Attack on Iran

Scott Ritter on Preventing U.S. Attack on Iran

http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/21753

Scott Ritter recently met with the Iranian ambassador to the US in
NYC. He announced this on April 18th during his speech at the War
Memorial in Indianapolis. Ritter outlined a plan to prevent the US
from attacking Iran and to scuttle US attempts to plant a "missile
defense shield" in Europe. The two part plan would involve Iran
opening up its nuclear program for inspections along with an Iranian
call for a regional ballistic missile disarmament program that would
include Israel.

He said that the US has decided to attack Iran, but felt that the war
could be prevented by influencing public opinion, primarily European.
"The American public is not going to wake up over night, don't hold
your breath," he said.

Watch on TraprockPeaceTV at youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aiZrWIVR69s

Coming: Q and A with Scott Ritter, with his discussion of media
"conspiracy" of silence, including its turning a blind eye to US
(CIA) funding of al-Qaeda associated groups in Lebanon to fight
against Iranian backed Hezbollah, as originally reported by Seymour
Hersh. (Now it appears that the US - in that it funds Pakistani
operations in the tribal areas - has been supporting Pakistani
military assistance for the Taliban in their efforts to kill Uzbek
militants. The Taliban have been attacking Uzbeks "because of their
reluctance to kill American troops."
See "Taliban All Over," The Economist, April 12, 2007.
http://www.economist.com/world/asia/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9008911

Why have US troops been dying in Iraq - we're told as part of a "war
against terror" directed at al-Qaeda - when the US has been funding
al-Qaeda in Lebanon? Why has the media been silent about this? And
why is the US supporting the Taliban's war against militants who do
not want to attack US troops?

The Scott Ritter program was sponsored by Veterans for Peace, Indiana
Chapter #49, Indianapolis Peace House & Plowshares,
Indianapolis Peace and Justice Center, and Traprock Peace Center.


Bill Moyers documentary Buying The War airs on PBS tonight at 9:00pm

Watch Bill Moyers documentary Buying The War online at http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/btw/watch.html


Episode Detail: Buying the War - Bill Moyers' Journal
http://www.tvguide.com/detail/tv-show.aspx?tvobjectid=200077&more=ucepisodelist&episodeid=6473363

A new season of the series (which last aired in 1994) opens with a look at coverage of the run-up to the Iraq War by the mainstream media, whom critics have slammed for not sufficiently challenging Bush administration claims about Iraq's possession of WMDs and its possible links to Al Qaeda. Commenting are Dan Rather; Tim Russert (“Meet the Press”); Bob Simon of “60 Minutes”; former CNN president Walter Isaacson; and John Walcott, Jonathan Landay and Warren Strobel of McClatchy Newspapers.

In the Charlotte area it will air on these cable channels WUNG 13, WNSC 15, UNCTV 200 & at 2am on UNC-ED 203.
And these broadcast channels WUNE 17, WUNE-DT 17.1, WNSC 30, WNSCD1 30.1, & WUNG 58.

Use this link for a station in your area airing the show http://www.tvguide.com/listings/setup/localizeus.aspx?RedirectUrl=%2ftvshows%2fmoyers-journal%2f200077


Support the Articles Of Impeachment on Cheney – take action at http://charlotteaction.blogspot.com/2007/04/support-kucinichs-call-to-impeach.html


April 28 National Impeachment Day
In Charlotte : Rally at 2pm near Rep. Sue Myrick’s office
Morrison Blvd & Sharon Rd.
www.CharlotteAction.org

Find or start impeachment action in your area : www.a28.org


May 19 National Truth About Recruiters Day
Get involved - www.May19.info


Action Center For Justice
www.CharlotteAction.org
704.492.8527

Kucinich's Articles of Impeachment on Cheney

http://kucinich.house.gov/SpotlightIssues/documents.htm

Supporting Documents for H Res 333

Synopsis of Resolution

Text of Resolution as Introduced in the House of Representatives

Letter to Vice President Cheney

Brief summary of impeachment procedure


Supporting Documents for Article I

Article I (1)(A): Transcripts of March 17, 2002 Press Conference by Vice President Dick Cheney and His Highness Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa, Crown Prince of Bahrain at Shaikh Hamad Palace.

Article I (1)(B): Transcripts of March 19, 2002 Press Briefing by Vice President Dick Cheney and Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in Jerusalem.

Article I (1)(C): Transcripts of March 24, 2002 Wolf Blitzer interview of Vice President Cheney on CNN’s Late Edition.

Article I (1)(D): Transcripts of May 19, 2002 Tim Russert interview with Vice President Cheney on NBC’s Meet the Press.

Article I (1)(E): Speech of Vice President Cheney at VFW 103rd National Convention on August 26, 2002.

Article I (1)(F & G): Transcripts of September 8, 2002 Tim Russert interview with Vice President Cheney on NBC’s Meet the Press.

Article I (1)(H): Transcripts of March 16, 2003 Tim Russert interview with Vice President Cheney on NBC’s Meet the Press.

Article I (2)(A): Pincus, Walter and Priest, Dana. “Some Iraq Analysts Felt Pressure From Cheney Visits.” Washington Post 5 June 2003: A01.

Article I (2)(B): Hersh, Seymour M. “The Stovepipe.” The New Yorker 27 October 2003.

Article I (3)(A): National Intelligence Estimate, October 1, 2002. pg. 9

Article I (3)(B): National Intelligence Estimate, October 1, 2002. pg. 84

Article I (3)(C): National Intelligence Estimate, October 1, 2002. pg. 9

United States service member deaths: Department of Defense Casualty Report

Iraqi civilian deaths: Lancet Report

Cost of the war: CRS report RL33110

Loss of military readiness: Korb, Lawrence. “A troop readiness crisis.” Boston Globe 11 April 2007.


Supporting Documents for Article II

Article II (1)(A): Speech of Vice President Cheney at the Air National Guard Senior Leadership Conference on December 2, 2002.

Article II (1)(B): Speech of Vice President Cheney to 30th Political Action Conference in Arlington, Virginia on January 30, 2003.

Article II (1)(C): Transcripts of March 16, 2003 Tim Russert interview with Vice President Cheney on NBC’s Meet the Press.

Article II (1)(D): Transcripts of September 14, 2003 Tim Russert interview with Vice President Cheney on NBC’s Meet the Press.

Article II (1)(E): Speech of Vice President Cheney at Bush-Cheney '04 Fundraiser in Iowa on October 3, 2003.

Article II (1)(F): Speech of Vice President Cheney to the Heritage Foundation on October 10, 2003.

Article II (1)(G): Hayes, Stephen. “Cheney v. Powell.” The Weekly Standard 13 January 2004.

Article II (1)(H): Transcripts of January 22, 2004 Juan Williams interview with Vice President Cheney on NPR’s Morning Edition.

Article II (1)(I): Transcripts of June 17, 2004 Gloria Borger interview with Vice President Cheney on CNBC’s Capital Report.

Article II (2)(A): Waas, Murray. “Key Bush Intelligence Briefing Kept From Hill Panel.” National Journal 22 November 2005.

Article II (2)(B): Jehl, Douglas. “Report Warned Bush Team About Intelligence Doubts.” New York Times 6 November 2005.

Article II (2)(C): “Leaked Report Rejects Iraqi al-Qaeda link.” BBC News 5 February 2003.

United States service member deaths: Department of Defense Casualty Report

Iraqi civilian deaths: Lancet Report

Cost of the war: CRS report RL33110

Loss of military readiness: Korb, Lawrence. “A troop readiness crisis.” Boston Globe 11 April 2007.


Supporting Documents for Article III

Article III (1)(A): Speech of Vice President Cheney to American Israel Public Affairs Committee 2006 Policy Conference on March 7, 2006.

Article III (1)(B): Transcripts of January 24, 2007 Wolf Blitzer interview with Vice President Cheney on CNN’s Situation Room.

Article III (1)(C): Transcripts of January 28, 2007 Richard Wolffe interview with Vice President Cheney for Newsweek Magazine.

Article III (1)(D): Transcripts of February 24, 2007 Press Briefing with Vice President Cheney and Australian Prime Minister in Sydney, Australia.

Article III (2)(A): Transcripts of February 19, 2007 Daniel Dombey interview with Director General Mohamed ElBaradei for the Financial Times.

Article III (2)(B): International Atomic Energy Agency Board of Governors Report, February 22, 2007.

Article III (2)(C): Transcripts of February 19, 2007 Daniel Dombey interview with Director General Mohamed ElBaradei for the Financial Times.

Article III (3)(A): Hirsh, Michael. “Hirsh: A Failed Shot at Peace with Iran?” Newsweek 8 February 2007.

Article III (3)(B): Abramowitz, Michael. “Cheney Says U.S. Is Sending ‘Strong Signal’ to Iran.” Washington Post 29 January 2007: A02.

Article III (3)(C): Hersh, Seymour M. “The Iran Plans.” The New Yorker 17 April 2006.

Article III (3)(D): Londono, Ernest and al-Izzi, Saad. “Iraq Intensifies Efforts to Expel Iranian Group.” Washington Post 14 March 2007: A10.

Article III (3)(E): Hersh, Seymour M. “The Iran Plans.” The New Yorker 17 April 2006.

Article III (4)(A): Article VI of Constitution of the United States of America.

Article III (4)(B): Chapter I, Article 2 of Charter of the United Nations

Article III (4)(C): Chapter VII, Article 51 of Charter of the United Nations

Support Kucinich's Call to Impeach Cheney - All out for Impeachment Day Saturday

Kucinich Has Introduced Articles of Impeachment Against Vice President Richard Cheney
Congressman Dennis Kucinich has acted. It's time now for us to follow through by asking the rest of Congress to get on board with the American public, and by letting the media know where we stand.


Ask your Congress Member to support impeachment proceedings against Vice President Cheney:
http://tinyurl.com/yttnxq

Ask members of the House Judiciary Committee and Speaker Nancy Pelosi to lead, follow, or get out of the way:
http://tinyurl.com/2ar8ch
T
ell the media that you support Congressman Dennis Kucinich's proposal to begin impeachment proceedings:
http://tinyurl.com/2cag7t

____________________
It's Time to Poll on Impeachment
After the Downing Street Memos proved George Bush lied about Iraq's WMDs, Democrats.com began lobbying corporate media polling organizations to include impeachment questions in their polls. For two years, those pollsters have contemptuously dismissed our requests. But now that Rep. Dennis Kucinich has introduced Articles of Impeachment for Dick Cheney, it is time for pollsters to include impeachment questions in every poll they take. You can ask them to here:
http://tinyurl.com/ys4yax
____________________
Public to Demand Impeachment at Capitol on Wednesday

WHAT: Coalition statement in support of impeachment
WHEN: 12:00 Noon ET, Wednesday, April 25, 2007
WHERE: The Cannon House Office Building Outdoor Terrace, Washington D.C.

A group of prominent Americans will gather at the U.S. Capitol to speak in support of beginning impeachment proceedings against President George W. Bush and Vice President Richard B. Cheney. Among them will be mayors, including Rocky Anderson of Salt Lake City and John Shields of Nyack, NY; state legislators including Washington State Senator Eric Oemig; city council members, including Dave Meserve of Arcata, CA; and former government officials, including Daniel Ellsberg who released the Pentagon Papers; David MacMichael, a former analyst for the Central Intelligence Agency and a member of the steering committee of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity; and retired Army Colonel Ann Wright, a career diplomat who quit in protest the day the war began.

Also participating will be authors, journalists, poets, and playwrights, including Chris Hedges, Justin Frank, Mark Kurlansky, John Nichols, David Lindorff, Gerald Stern, and Ann Marie Macari; actors, producers, and photographers, including Eunice Wong, and Kathy Chalfant, leading anti-war voices, including Andy Shallal, Cindy Sheehan, Tina Richards, Medea Benjamin, Bob Fertik, David Swanson, Debra Sweet, Kevin Zeese, Michael Berg, Carlos Arredondo, and Elaine Brower; and organizer of the national day of impeachment events coming up on April 28th Jacob Park.

Town Hall Forum on Impeachment Wednesday Evening


An open forum on impeachment will be held in a church Wednesday evening, featuring some of the speakers from the noon event: Rocky Anderson, Mayor, Salt Lake City; John Shields, mayor of Nyack, NY. Debra Sweet for World Can’t Wait-Drive Out the Bush Regime, Norman Birnbaum of Georgetown University, and Marcus Raskin, Institute for Policy Studies.

WHEN: 7:00 to 9:00 p.m. ET, Wednesday, April 25, 2007

WHERE: All Souls Unitarian Church, Pierce Hall, at 1500 Harvard Street N.W., Washington, D.C.
____________________

Events Are Scheduled Everywhere on Saturday
Find one near you:

When you join together with people on April 28, please plan to have with you stack of impeachment petitions, some pens, and some clipboards. Collect people's names and contact info on the petitions. Then use that list to organize future activist efforts locally, and also add the names to the national list. You can get the petitions and everything you need at:
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/petition
____________________
Here Comes the Veto
The Democrats in Congress have watered their war funding bill down, so that it merely "sets a goal" to end the war. But Bush may follow through on his promise to veto it, and he may do so this Friday. When he does, our response should be to demand of Congress:

No New Supplemental
Impeachment Instead
Let your Congress Member know that you don't want a weaker or stronger or fancier war funding bill. You want impeachment:
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/congress
____________________
Happy Springtime (Bush Is Over)
Watch this amazing and inspiring video:
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/21662
All out for National Impeachment Day this Saturday
April 28, 2007
2:00 pm
Rally at Morrison Blvd & Sharon Rd
(Near Rep. Sue Myrick's office)
Charlotte, NC
Info: www.CharlotteAction.org or call 704.492.8527

May 19 National Truth About Recruiters Day







May 19 National Truth About Recruiters Day
http://www.May19.info/

On May 19th, 2007, Armed Forces Day, people will
set up information tables and hold events outside
every military recruiting office across the country to
tell the truth about military recruiters. Iraq War Military
Resister, Terri Johnson, who went AWOL from the Army
rather than be sent to Iraq, told the crowd at the
April 21 anti-war rally in Greensboro, NC that we
all needed to be at the recruiters offices to tell young
people the truth. This is the beginning of such an
effort and we will continue these activities on a
daily basis. Join us to help expose military recruiters
out of our schools and communities.

List your event on our website, click here.

Volunteer to help in your area, click here.

Get help organizing an event in you area, click here.

Endorse the May 19 National Truth About Recruiters Day, click here.

The May 19 National Truth About Recruiters Day was initiated
by the Action Center For Justice.

Donate: We need funds for printing thousands of leaflets,
postage, newspaper ads, and the costs of organizing the
May 19 National Truth About Recruiters Day to insure its success.
Click here to donate online or by mail.

Contact us:
May 19 National Truth About Recruiters Day
www.May19.info
704.492.8527

Hundreds Protest Wars & Torture, Demand Impeachment in Greensboro

Hundreds Protest Wars & Torture, Demand Impeachment in Greensboro

Photos by Greensboro Peace Coalition at
http://home.earthlink.net/~norasbooks/Cindy%20Sheehan/index.html

Photos by John Rash at
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rashphoto/sets/72157600108407804/

Video of local news coverage http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHZteaQRG2k

Greensboro, NC
Hundreds Protest Wars & Torture, Demand Impeachment

By David Dixon

On Saturday, April 21 over 400 hundred people marched and rallied in Greensboro against the wars in Iraq & Afghanistan, against torture & for the impeachment of Bush & Cheney. Groups that took part and/or spoke included Action Center For Justice, Chapel Hill Students for a Democratic Society, CodePink Charlotte, Grassroots Impeachment Movement (GRIM), Greensboro Peace Coalition, Justice at Smithfield Campaign, NC Labor Against The War, UNCG Campus Anti-War Coalition, Cakalak Thunder drummers, the World Can't Wait, ANSWER & Troops Out Now Coalitions, musical performances and others.

Local activists with Food Not Bombs provided food and drinks to the protesters.

The two keynote speakers were Cindy Sheehan, founder of Gold Star Families For Peace, and Terri Johnson, Iraq War G.I. Resister.

Of course, everyone was excited to hear Cindy speak and listened intently as she spoke the truth about the war from her perspective as a mother that lost her son, Casey. It was easy to see why Cindy has been referred to as “the Rosa Parks of the anti-war movement” by Rev Yearwood of the Hip Hop Caucus Against War as she energized the crowd to work for peace.

Terri Johnson, who went AWOL from the Army rather than being sent to Iraq gave an incredible and impassioned speech. She told us that anyone can get out of the military if they want to and we need to let the soldiers know that. She said we need to let the soldiers know we want to get them home any way we can and we will accept them when they get here, no matter how we feel about the war. It is important that we support G.I.’s that are resisting this illegal war. As someone who had been tricked by the recruiters promises into joining the military, Terri, told us we need to be outside the military recruitering offices to tell young people the truth.

A Palestinian Flag flew at the stage throughout the rally. This was a thoroughly anti-imperialist, multi-national demonstration.

The action was chaired by Scott Trent, with World Can’t Wait – Greensboro, the organizers of the demonstration.

The same pro-war group that tried to disrupt the March 17 March on the Pentagon, Gathering of Eagles, that has close ties to the Republican Party; Move America Forward; Free Republic, an “internet activism site for conservatives”; and Veterans for Victory, an entity headed by two retired Army officers who were central to the initial assault on Baghdad and pursuit of Saddam Hussein, tried again to disrupt this protest to no avail. (Workers World, March 22, 2007, “Tens of thousands march to Pentagon”). The anti-war protesters outnumbered the rightwing group by at least 4 to 1 and GOE’s taunts and curse words could not be heard from the protest stage. In fact, Scott Trent said it was the best anti-war/pro-impeachment protest they ever had in Greensboro.


April 28 National Impeach Bush & Cheney Day
– Details at http://www.charlotteaction.org/

-------------------------------------------------------

Donatewww.geocities.com/nomorevictims/support

Action Center For Justice
http://www.charlotteaction.org/
704.492.8527

Impeachment Rallies Sat. - Kucinich starts Impeachment of Cheney

Sat., April 28, 2007

National Impeach Bush & Cheney Day

Rally at 2:00pm
Morrison Blvd & Sharon Rd
(near Rep. Sue Myrick's office)

George Bush and Dick Cheney have lied the nation into a war of aggression, are spying in open violation of the law, and have sanctioned the use of torture. These are high crimes and misdemeanors that demand accountability. Bring signs, banners, etc

Info: Action Center For Justice www.CharlotteAction.org or call 704.492.8527

Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) will hold a news conference tomorrow afternoon to announce the introduction of articles of impeachment relating to the Vice President of the United States Richard B. Cheney. Americans around the country will take to the streets on Saturday in more than 100 locations to call for the impeachment of both Cheney and Bush. Action Center For Justice is the organizer of the action in Charlotte , NC and would welcome the opportunity to tell you more.

KUCINICH TO SEEK CHENEY IMPEACHMENT: AMERICANS TO TAKE TO STREETS NATIONWIDE ON APRIL 28 TO DEMONSTRATE SUPPORT AND LAUNCH "IMPEACHMENT SUMMER"

Following on today's announcement by Rep. Dennis Kucinich that he will file Articles of Impeachment against Vice-President Dick Cheney, Americans across the country will take to the streets on April 28 to call for the impeachment of both Cheney and Bush. From Miami , Florida to the North Pole, Alaska , and right here in Charlotte more than 100 actions are planned nationwide.

Jacob Park, National Coordinator of the April 28 actions, said "George Bush and Dick Cheney lied the nation into an illegal war of aggression, are spying on millions of innocent Americans, and have authorized the use of torture. The time has come for all Americans—-particularly our representatives in Congress—-to decide where they stand. To turn a blind eye to lying, spying, and torture makes a mockery of our most basic values and the very notion of democracy."

On April 28, a visit by George Bush to Miami will be greeted with a massive impeachment rally organized by dozens of local groups. At the California Democratic Convention in San Diego , hundreds of delegates will defy the party leadership by bringing an impeachment resolution to the floor.Thousands of Americans will form "human murals" spelling out "IMPEACH!" with their bodies at Ocean Beach in San Francisco, Coney Island in New York, the foot of the Washington monument in Washington, D.C., and other locations. And elsewhere people will spell it out in myriad other ways ranging from banners drops on freeway overpasses to a skywriting plane over the New Orleans Jazzfest to a guerrilla impeachment slideshow on the buildings of New York City .

For more information about the Charlotte rally and impeachment activities and more details about events nationwide contact Action Center For Justice at (704) 492-8527 or see www.CharlotteAction.org.

Donate to support our events & actions at www.geocities.com/nomorevictims/support

Action Center For Justice
www.CharlotteAction.org
704.492.8527

Vermont Senate approves impeachment resolution

Vermont Senate approves impeachment resolution
By Burlington Free Press

MONTPELIER -- The Vermont Senate voted 16-9 this morning to urge the state's congressional delegation to initiate impeachment proceedings against President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney.

The vote came quietly in the Senate chamber, with no impeachment supporters in the room and no debate. The senate resolution was introduced by Sens. Peter Shumlin and Jeanette White, two Windham County Democrats.

Impeachment supporters have lobbied legislators to take up the matter, and this week were back in Montpelier to press legislative leaders. Shumlin and Speaker of the House Gaye Symington have told supporters there was no time for full legislative debate and action in the issue in this session, but reminded them that a single legislator could raise the issue at anytime.

__________

Report from citizen lobbying effort this week in Montpelier:
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/21535

Call by Vermont's 3rd-largest newspaper for impeachment:
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/21428

Explanation of how a state can petition the U.S. House to impeach:
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/resolutions

Representative Daryl Pillsbury (I. Brattleboro) introduced a resolution on Thursday, Feb. 15, 2007: JRH-15, but it has not yet passed in the Vermont House.

Background on Vermont Impeachment, including reports, videos, analysis:
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/vt

Local organizer Dan Dewalt patrioticresponse@yahoo.com

Local organizing website http://www.vtimpeach.com

Speakers Available:

http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/speakers

TELL THE MEDIA
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/1084

TELL CONGRESS
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/petition

TAKE ACTION ON APRIL 28
http://www.a28.org


Action Center For Justice
www.CharlotteAction.org

MoveOn Sells Out Peace Movement (Again)

MoveOn Moves In with Pelosi
The netroots group’s support proved crucial to passage of the Democrats’ Iraq spending plan. But antiwar activists say MoveOn has been co-opted by its access to power.

by Farhad Manjoo

When Eli Pariser, the executive director of MoveOn.org, looks at the Iraq spending bill that Nancy Pelosi and other Democratic leaders managed to pass in the House today, what he sees is a way to end the war. The bill, which won passage on a nearly strict party-line vote, commits $124 billion to fund operations in Iraq, but it calls for removal of American combat troops by the summer of 2008. The plan is not perfect, Pariser concedes. It does not require complete withdrawal. Still, this week, MoveOn signed on to Pelosi’s supplemental funding bill, citing a poll of its members showing overwhelming support of the idea.

0323 03MoveOn’s longtime allies in the antiwar movement, however, look at the bill — and MoveOn’s support for it — and see something very different. Groups who call for immediate withdrawal argue that MoveOn’s position is a betrayal of their cause, and that Pelosi’s bill merely continues the war while allowing Democrats to say they’ve done something to oppose it. Cindy Sheehan, the “peace mom” who favors immediate withdrawal, describes MoveOn as supporting “the slow-bleed strategy of the Democratic leadership.” Gail Murphy, of the group CodePink, says, “MoveOn has taken a compromised position — in fact I think they were involved behind the scenes in creating a compromised position.” Other peace activists call MoveOn’s e-mail poll of its membership a sham. If MoveOn’s millions of members knew the full details of the bill, they would surely oppose it.

MoveOn, which began with an e-mail petition opposing President Clinton’s impeachment in 1998, has grown into one of the biggest and best-known netroots groups on the left. When Republicans controlled the White House and the Congress, it raised millions of dollars in soft money for insurgent liberal candidates and produced memorable commercials blasting President Bush. Now, however, with the Democrats running the House and Senate, MoveOn’s stance on the Pelosi bill has led critics to suggest complicity with the new congressional power structure. MoveOn has settled for something less than ideal. It’s the classic problem the outsider faces after getting inside: Now that it’s got an in with the speaker of the House, has MoveOn lost its soul?

It’s true that Pariser, a 26-year-old who has worked for MoveOn since 2001, looks at the Iraq supplemental bill with a shrewdly pragmatic eye. Of all the Iraq plans discussed in Congress this week — including one by liberal members calling for a quicker, complete withdrawal — Pariser saw Pelosi’s bill as the left’s best chance. He saw it as the only one that could plausibly pass. And Pariser argues that its passage will help end the war. “Let’s play this out,” he says. “Congress passes a supplemental with a timeline attached and Bush is forced to veto it. That forces the Republicans to choose between an increasingly isolated president and the majority of the Congress and the majority of the American people.” The bill is thus a starting point for future efforts. It builds legislative support, Pariser says, for an eventual congressional mandate to withdraw.

MoveOn has long been part of Win Without War, a large collection of progressive antiwar groups; now it is virtually alone among the coalition’s membership in its support for the Pelosi plan. Sheehan says that some in the antiwar movement were so upset at MoveOn’s position this week that they spent a couple of days drawing up full-page newspaper ads accusing the group of betraying its members. (In the end they decided to hold their fire, at least for now.)

But whatever the mainstream impression of MoveOn may be, it has never been a lockstep member of the idealistic, activist left. It may have seemed that way during the years of one-party GOP rule, when MoveOn and other progressive groups fought a common enemy. But the real story here goes back to an earlier age; MoveOn has always had a more pragmatic agenda than its lefty brothers. The group was founded to solve a political impasse in a practical way: When Berkeley software developers Joan Blades and Wes Boyd drafted their online petition calling for Congress not to impeach Bill Clinton, they were suggesting that it censure him instead, so that the nation could “move on” to other business. Not exactly a very lefty position.

MoveOn is now one of the largest activist groups in the country, but its popularity is more a consequence of its organizational savvy than any pie-in-the-sky plans. Peace groups believe in the grand possibilities of the firm, principled stand. But MoveOn has never had much truck with idealists. For Pariser, the bottom line on Iraq is the vote count. “If we could tell all of the Democrats plus the number of Republicans we’d need to survive a veto to end the war, we would,” he says. “But getting that level of support for ending the war — it sucks, it’s terrible that so many politicians in Washington are out of step with where people are, but it’s the case. And so we’ve got to make it hurt for them to support a continued war.”

What precipitated the recent scuffle between MoveOn and its former allies was an e-mail that Pariser sent to MoveOn’s members on Sunday, March 18, asking them to help guide the group’s position on the war debate in Congress. As Salon’s Michael Scherer has noted, the e-mail read like a push poll; Pariser described Pelosi’s plan and Bush’s opposition to it, and made only cursory mention of progressives’ concerns. He did not describe plans floated by members of the House’s Out of Iraq Caucus that would have funded a quick withdrawal from Iraq. “Should we support or oppose the Democrats’ plan?” Pariser asked in the e-mail. Slightly more than a hundred thousand MoveOn members voted in the poll. The vast majority — 84.6 percent — sided with “the Democrats.”

“It reads like a Soviet ballot,” says John Stauber, the founder of the Center for Media & Democracy, whose harsh indictment of MoveOn’s survey has been a hot item on lefty blogs this week. If Pariser had more thoroughly educated members about all of the positions in the debate, many would have voted against the Pelosi plan, Stauber says. More important, MoveOn could have helped the chances of an amendment by Reps. Barbara Lee, Maxine Waters and Lynn Woolsey, leaders of the Out of Iraq Caucus, that called for withdrawal of all troops by the end of 2007. “They could have put out an alert to 3.2 million people across the country and said, ‘If you do anything tomorrow, get up and call your representatives and tell them to support the Lee Amendment,’” insists CodePink’s Gail Murphy. “They’ve got millions of dollars. If they put their money toward stopping this war, we’d have a lot more leadership in the Democratic Congress toward stopping this war.” But MoveOn didn’t stump for the Lee plan, and it died in committee.

Pariser defends his e-mail. He says that the group already knew that its members would have supported Barbara Lee’s plan, but whatever MoveOn did, it would never have passed. What MoveOn didn’t know was what its members thought about the Pelosi plan. “The choice that we needed to make as an organization was, Do we support this thing or not?” Pariser says. “And so I think the e-mail was a very fair presentation of the choice that was actually in front of the organization.”

Pariser also says that his critics have confused MoveOn’s policies with its political strategy — they’ve confused what MoveOn wants with MoveOn’s efforts to get there. What the group wants, he says, is what everyone in the peace camp wants: withdrawal as fast as possible. But there is no clear political path to immediate withdrawal. “Unfortunately we’re living in a world where in order for anything to happen on Iraq that forces the president’s hand, were going to need two thirds of Congress.” MoveOn’s strategy arises out of this parliamentary consideration; its goal is now legislative, to build toward two-thirds support in Congress.

Pariser has previously drawn a sharp distinction between MoveOn and the Democratic Party. In 2005, he told Salon’s Tim Grieve that “the job of a party is to get elected and the job of a movement is to promote ideas and an ideology,” and that “we’re definitely on the movement side of the equation. We don’t want to be the party.” People in the peace camp, though, say that MoveOn has lately found a special place in the Democratic leadership structure. It’s the safe antiwar group. Members of Congress can meet with MoveOn because they’re sure it won’t call for something too far out. Other organizations have been shut out. Gail Murphy, of CodePink, is on the steering committee of United for Peace and Justice, which represents 1,400 peace groups. “We’ve asked for meetings with Pelosi,” she says. “We were never approached to sit down and have a conversation.”

Pariser is skeptical of the idea that MoveOn has much power with Democratic leaders. “I wouldn’t be over-grandiose about our influence with Nancy Pelosi,” he says. “We’re still a group of outsiders trying to create change in Washington, D.C.” He concedes that some members of Congress considered MoveOn’s support important, and as a result, he says, the group held out to provide it in order to get a better bill. And they saw results. “This wasn’t due only to us,” he says, “but in those two weeks the timetable was added to the bill.”

MoveOn’s imprimatur has certainly given many Democrats cover to vote for the Pelosi bill. And this is really the main criticism people in the peace camp level at MoveOn. “The leadership wants to say, ‘Hey look, everyone voted for an antiwar bill,” Stauber says. “So I think the peace movement is being hijacked and rerouted to serve a Democratic leadership and the 2008 political agenda.” But Stauber believes the effort won’t work; most of MoveOn’s members, he notes, didn’t even vote in Pariser’s poll. “They’ve grown so blas&eacaute; about MoveOn’s appeals that they don’t even bother to open their e-mail,” he says. And when MoveOn can’t reach people by e-mail, what can it do?

Pariser disagrees; he thinks MoveOn members really got the substance of the debate at hand, and that they do agree with the group’s stance. “Our members aren’t stupid,” he says, “and they responded in a serious and thoughtful way to the political question of whether this incremental step to isolate the president and the people who oppose a timeline is worth supporting.”

Copyright ©2007 Salon Media Group

Are We Politicians or Citizens?

Are We Politicians or Citizens?

by Howard Zinn



The Progressive
May 2007 Issue

As I write this, Congress is debating timetables for withdrawal from Iraq. In response to the Bush Administration's "surge" of troops, and the Republicans' refusal to limit our occupation, the Democrats are behaving with their customary timidity, proposing withdrawal, but only after a year, or eighteen months. And it seems they expect the anti-war movement to support them.

That was suggested in a recent message from MoveOn, which polled its members on the Democrat proposal, saying that progressives in Congress, "like many of us, don't think the bill goes far enough, but see it as the first concrete step to ending the war."

Ironically, and shockingly, the same bill appropriates $124 billion in more funds to carry the war. It's as if, before the Civil War, abolitionists agreed to postpone the emancipation of the slaves for a year, or two years, or five years, and coupled this with an appropriation of funds to enforce the Fugitive Slave Act.

When a social movement adopts the compromises of legislators, it has forgotten its role, which is to push and challenge the politicians, not to fall in meekly behind them.

We who protest the war are not politicians. We are citizens. Whatever politicians may do, let them first feel the full force of citizens who speak for what is right, not for what is winnable, in a shamefully timorous Congress.

Timetables for withdrawal are not only morally reprehensible in the case of a brutal occupation (would you give a thug who invaded your house, smashed everything in sight, and terrorized your children a timetable for withdrawal?) but logically nonsensical. If our troops are preventing civil war, helping people, controlling violence, then why withdraw at all? If they are in fact doing the opposite - provoking civil war, hurting people, perpetuating violence - they should withdraw as quickly as ships and planes can carry them home.

It is four years since the United States invaded Iraq with a ferocious bombardment, with "shock and awe." That is enough time to decide if the presence of our troops is making the lives of the Iraqis better or worse. The evidence is overwhelming. Since the invasion, hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have died, and, according to the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, about two million Iraqis have left the country, and an almost equal number are internal refugees, forced out of their homes, seeking shelter elsewhere in the country.

Yes, Saddam Hussein was a brutal tyrant. But his capture and death have not made the lives of Iraqis better, as the U.S. occupation has created chaos: no clean water, rising rates of hunger, 50 percent unemployment, shortages of food, electricity, and fuel, a rise in child malnutrition and infant deaths. Has the U.S. presence diminished violence? On the contrary, by January 2007 the number of insurgent attacks has increased dramatically to 180 a day.

The response of the Bush Administration to four years of failure is to send more troops. To add more troops matches the definition of fanaticism: If you find you're going in the wrong direction, redouble your speed. It reminds me of the physician in Europe in the early nineteenth century who decided that bloodletting would cure pneumonia. When that didn't work, he concluded that not enough blood had been let.

The Congressional Democrats' proposal is to give more funds to the war, and to set a timetable that will let the bloodletting go on for another year or more. It is necessary, they say, to compromise, and some anti-war people have been willing to go along. However, it is one thing to compromise when you are immediately given part of what you are demanding, if that can then be a springboard for getting more in the future. That is the situation described in the recent movie The Wind That Shakes The Barley, in which the Irish rebels against British rule are given a compromise solution - to have part of Ireland free, as the Irish Free State. In the movie, Irish brother fights against brother over whether to accept this compromise. But at least the acceptance of that compromise, however short of justice, created the Irish Free State. The withdrawal timetable proposed by the Democrats gets nothing tangible, only a promise, and leaves the fulfillment of that promise in the hands of the Bush Administration.

There have been similar dilemmas for the labor movement. Indeed, it is a common occurrence that unions, fighting for a new contract, must decide if they will accept an offer that gives them only part of what they have demanded. It's always a difficult decision, but in almost all cases, whether the compromise can be considered a victory or a defeat, the workers have been given some thing palpable, improving their condition to some degree. If they were offered only a promise of something in the future, while continuing an unbearable situation in the present, it would not be considered a compromise, but a sellout. A union leader who said, "Take this, it's the best we can get" (which is what the MoveOn people are saying about the Democrats' resolution) would be hooted off the platform.

I am reminded of the situation at the 1964 Democratic National Convention in Atlantic City, when the black delegation from Mississippi asked to be seated, to represent the 40 percent black population of that state. They were offered a "compromise" - two nonvoting seats. "This is the best we can get," some black leaders said. The Mississippians, led by Fannie Lou Hamer and Bob Moses, turned it down, and thus held on to their fighting spirit, which later brought them what they had asked for. That mantra - "the best we can get" - is a recipe for corruption.

It is not easy, in the corrupting atmosphere of Washington, D.C., to hold on firmly to the truth, to resist the temptation of capitulation that presents itself as compromise. A few manage to do so. I think of Barbara Lee, the one person in the House of Representatives who, in the hysterical atmosphere of the days following 9/11, voted against the resolution authorizing Bush to invade Afghanistan. Today, she is one of the few who refuse to fund the Iraq War, insist on a prompt end to the war, reject the dishonesty of a false compromise.

Except for the rare few, like Barbara Lee, Maxine Waters, Lynn Woolsey, and John Lewis, our representatives are politicians, and will surrender their integrity, claiming to be "realistic."

We are not politicians, but citizens. We have no office to hold on to, only our consciences, which insist on telling the truth. That, history suggests, is the most realistic thing a citizen can do.

--------

Howard Zinn is the author, most recently, of A Power Governments Cannot Suppress.